Push Gaming Slots: Profitability, Volatility & Best Games to Win (2025)

---

Advantages

1. Competitive RTP Rates: Push Gaming offers an impressive range of RTP values across its slots, frequently exceeding industry averages. Games like Wild Swarm (97.03% RTP) and The Shadow Order (96.98% RTP) position these slots favorably for players seeking a better long-term return on investment.
2. Diverse Game Mechanics: Many Push Gaming slots utilize innovative grid structures and “ways to win” formats, as seen in titles like Immortal Guild (1024 ways to win) and Fire Hopper (7x7 grid). This variety enriches gameplay experiences and can lead to more dynamic winning combinations compared to traditional five-reel slots.
3. High Maximum Win Potential: The provider incorporates striking maximum win potentials, such as the Goat Getter with potential maximums of 10,000 coins and Fat Santa allowing for up to €160,000. Such high ceilings are attractive for thrill-seeking high rollers and create excitement around gameplay.
4. Low Minimum Bets: With minimum bet options starting as low as €0.1 (e.g., Razor Shark), Push Gaming accommodates casual players or those testing their strategies without substantial financial risk. This inclusivity allows various player demographics to engage with the slots.
5. Variety of Themes and Styles: Push Gaming’s diverse catalog caters to a wide array of player preferences, from whimsical graphics in Fat Rabbit to the exciting adventure of Viking Clash. This variety not only keeps players engaged but also allows them to find themes that resonate with their gaming tastes.

Disadvantages

1. Inconsistent RTP Values: While many slots feature high RTPs, other titles, such as Nightfall with a 94.23% RTP, fall below average. This inconsistency may lead to player dissatisfaction, especially for those who prioritize RTP in their slot choices.
2. High Volatility in Many Titles: Several Push Gaming slots are categorized as high volatility, such as Bison Battle and Fat Drac. This classification may lead to prolonged periods without wins, which could be frustrating for players seeking more frequent payout experiences.
3. Unpredictable Payline Structures: Some games lack clear paylines, instead offering "ways to win" or cluster mechanics. While this can enhance gameplay, it may also confuse players unfamiliar with these structures, especially those used to traditional fixed payline slots.
4. Higher House Edges: Games with RTPs below 96% present higher house edges, which could deter players focused on long-term profitability. For example, Fat Banker has outlined a 4.56% house advantage, equating to an expected disadvantage for players in the long run.
5. Rare High Payouts: Despite the attractive maximum win figures, these payouts often rely on hitting specific features or multipliers, which may not occur frequently. This rarity can lead to disappointment for players chasing substantial wins, as exemplified in games like Razor Shark that offer high win potentials but at infrequent occurrence rates.